Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International conference presentation
(Indianapolis, IN 19 Sep 2016) results are in and I would say they are favorable.
Of course, there are a few outliers who found the presentation inappropriate.
One of them describing the presentation as “A rant with pictures.” Which is NOT
only correct but, unfortunately for them, I love their chosen words of
discontent. So much so, I might even use it as a new presentation title.
the report, which I cut and, so that it is a bit easier to follow, edited
before pasting it on here. Note, the presentation session was shared with
another presenter (who presentation topic was about post-op care and decreased
admissions) and those results are also included in the initial portion of the
results. However, I took the liberty, as best I could, to highlight the
comments I believe were specific to my portion of the session—me guessing the
highlighted comments are for my session but I could be wrong.
tally of attendees was 33, which was close to what I had guess (25-30) in the After-Action
Evaluation Report (Combined Presentations)
Improving Clinical Practice and
Patient Satisfaction to Decrease Readmissions
Monday, 19 September 2016: 10:15
AM - 11:00 AM
If yes, please describe new
knowledge or skills you will apply to your practice.
-Be a little more proactive
about the daily up front education process throughout every step of the
process. Reviewing an important teaching point in regards to care of the
patient post procedure to help with the decrease of readmission. Education
and comprehension is key.
-Need more money placed on clinical outcomes and on the healthcare
workers in order to take healthcare back.
-Home care nursing included as
the team, especially education and teaching
-Was considering ideas for
-I enjoyed the lecture on CABG
surgery, but found the
second lecture to be inappropriate/non-beneficial.
-Thoughtful ways to include
families to prevent readmissions
-The concept of "hand off
for home" should be promoted in our clinical practice.
-It gave me a new perspective on how to manage patient
-leading a community outreach
initiative motivated toward this topic goal, the seminar learning was
valuable and supportive
Patients Are NEVER Customers - Jose Angel Torres, MSN, RN, FNP-BC,
NP, CNS (From this point forward ONLY pertains to my portion of the session).
Please rate each of the following
For each speaker, please rate your
level of agreement with the listed statement:
-An interesting concept. Thank
you for allowing this speaker to have his say. I hope his efforts spark
some conversation and perhaps some research!
-I still not entirely sure what
I was supposed to get out of this presentation other than we should not
cater to our patients. This did not seem appropriate nor [sic] beneficial.
-A rant with pictures. Not a
scholarly presentation with evidence to support statements. A real
-very true need more topics on
how to deal with and not just tolerate.
-Even though people think about
what he was saying, it is hard to include it in the work environment. I did
enjoy hearing his opinion.
-Was very opinion based but was
very correct in his beliefs and views on healthcare.
-I felt that much of the content
of this presentation was inappropriate and not based on current literature.
My added two sense [sic]:
-Despite I looked and looked and looked and
contemplated and tried to figure it out, I could not decipher the value or
significance of the cell titled “average” in the last row of each question set evaluated.
-The most obvious, and this is with every thing for the most
part and the
theme of a very early blog, and that is, that despite everyone is
listening to the same words from the same person at the same time the
interpretation of those words can be at opposite ends of the continuum filtered through individual paradigm and/or prejudice. Here
again that is evident.
-From the beginning, two points can be assessed from the
initial comments. For example, “It gave me a new perspective on how to manage
patient satisfaction,” which I hope was a manager’s words seeing it from a “new
perspective” and hopeful will lead to change for the better. But then there
was, “Need more money placed on clinical outcomes…” versus “…found the second
lecture (that would be mine despite I presented first) to be inappropriate/non-beneficial.”
-Interestingly, two-thirds did not find either presentation
would change their professional practice. Note, that number as it relates to
both presentations and not mine specifically. That said, I can understand it
not changing the practice for those who do not manage or discharge post-op patients.
But customer satisfaction crosses ALL spectrums of healthcare. And why in that sense,
I find it disappointing that my presentation was not of any worth. However,
could it also be because of the culture at their organization that would not
permit for such drastic change that they were unable to
appreciate the value of the presentation.
-On the other hand, two-thirds found my presentation specifically to be
appropriate and agreed or strongly agreed that there was the ability to apply
the information to current practice. Although that sounds positive toward my goals it makes no sense when the above-mentioned was just the opposite. Confusing!
-Three-quarters specifically found my presentation to be engaging. That's good!
-Almost 70% found my presentation to be bias-free which
makes no sense for several reasons but most notable: (1) Every slide had the
book’s picture, website, and Facebook address on it. That by definition is bias. (2) On top of that, the presentation itself is
100% bias as I DO NOT give another view but mine. That too by definition is bias. So not sure what that question or the
responses, for that matter, pertains to. But who am I to judge! I'll take the compliment!
-Some 82% thought I was knowledgeable about the topic and
84% thought the topic was presented clearly. Both being reassuring.
-The additional comments speak for themselves.
Overall, I would have to say the presentation was received well.
That being one of the presentation’s goals—bringing awareness. In that sense I would that
is a good step in the right direction. As for the two other goals, recruit
companions and arouse change, some of the attendees did come up and made
positive comments, to include the comment here of, “It gave me a new
perspective on how to manage patient satisfaction.” However, for a lack of
better terms, no one signed up to jump on this journey. That said, this was a
tough audience. Literally, this was being in the lion’s den as these healthcare
societies, especially in nursing, are addicted to the Kool-Aide of the status
quo and anyone pushing back, like myself, is ALWAYS labeled “inappropriate” and even a persona non grata.